Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0461 13
Original file (NR0461 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT GF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7015S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

CRS
Decket No: 461-13
15 April 2014

 

This is-in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 September 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together
with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of ‘probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 December
13997. You received nonjudicial punishment and were convicted by
a summary court-martial of two periods of unauthorized absence
totaling 28 days and wrongful use of marijuana.

It appears that your commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions
by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After review by the
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and on 17 March 2000 you were separated with a
discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of
misconduct due to drug abuse.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall record of service. The Board concluded that these
factors are insufficient to warrant a change in the
characterization of service, given your use of illegal drugs and
other misconduct. Accordingly, your application is denied. The
names and votes of the members of the Board panel will be
provided upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
Bye >, nena

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06246-07

    Original file (06246-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 February 1989, you were notified of pending administrative separation action for misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00677-11

    Original file (00677-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of an NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06952-08

    Original file (06952-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 14 May 1984, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01717-10

    Original file (01717-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12755-09

    Original file (12755-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct or personal abuse of drugs could result in administrative discharge action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02718-11

    Original file (02718-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On § March 1993, you received the OTH discharge due to misconduct for drug abuse (use)).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10112-10

    Original file (10112-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 October 1986, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of misconduct for drug abuse (use).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04313-12

    Original file (04313-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that on 25 July 1986, you were briefed on the Navy’s policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03165-08

    Original file (03165-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 12 April 1984, the separation authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and, on 20 April 1984 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09560-06

    Original file (09560-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 October 1984 you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. You subsequently attended a substance abuse...